I was looking to source imagery for the my illustration
of Ted Hughes poem's and so one of the places I have looked is out in nature,
seeing this is the subject of Hughes's work. Going on a series of walks in the
countryside to observe and see what I could take from the experience was and
still is one of the processes I use to source content.
I took a series of photographs.
One of the things that struck me was the shapes of the actual
earth in the field. The patterns and textures, browns and greys. One of the
concepts I played with was taking strips of the brown earth, cut them into
rectangles, and try to extract the shapes of the clods. But on some level this
seemed disingenuous to the actual location and perhaps too abstract to use in the
final work.
I could use these images as backgrounds for my drawings,
the question of backgrounds having been prominent in my latest studies.
Potentially these fields of brown could be abstracted and worked up as grounds
to draw upon, but would this have the same effect as my abstract drawings of
the clods of earth?
Further development
I plan to take more photographs of the landscape and more
importantly some of the individual 'characters' within it, such as the trees
and birds. These are the elements that at the moment make up the core messages
and narrative of my illustration. I may also source the colours from these
images, although at the moment I am using black and white.
No comments:
Post a Comment